C/CCLARI CURRENT
SearchNewsroom
HOW AUTOMATION HELPS

AI transparency

AI can accelerate newsroom work. It cannot become a source, witness, credential, or accountable editor.

Where AI may be used

Where AI is not authoritative

A model output is never cited as evidence for an outside fact. Models do not conduct interviews, witness events, possess lived experience, or hold professional licenses. ClariCurrent does not assign invented degrees, employers, awards, photographs, social accounts, or personal histories to automated editorial roles.

Human accountability

Every public article is assigned to a permanent editorial desk. High-harm topics—including health decisions, allegations, conflict, safety, and consequential financial claims—require human review before publication. Automated systems cannot waive that requirement.

Disclosure on articles

When automation materially shapes a story in a way readers would reasonably want to understand, the article will describe its role. Routine spelling assistance or formatting need not receive a separate label, but substantial automated synthesis, translation, data processing, or generated imagery should be disclosed in context.

Originality and scaled-content safeguards

The system may reject a draft that lacks sufficient independent evidence or reader value. ClariCurrent does not publish pages merely because a keyword, feed item, or trend exists. Combining sources without original explanation, judgment, context, or analysis is not an acceptable article.

Errors and feedback

AI-related concerns may be sent to editor@claricurrent.com. Factual concerns should use the corrections process.

Last reviewed: 28 August 2026 · Questions may be sent to editor@claricurrent.com.