AI transparency
AI can accelerate newsroom work. It cannot become a source, witness, credential, or accountable editor.
Where AI may be used
- Grouping reports that appear to describe the same event.
- Translating source material for editorial review, with original-language checks for material claims.
- Comparing claims, dates, names, and figures across an evidence packet.
- Suggesting outlines, questions, counterpoints, or draft language.
- Screening drafts for unsupported claims, close paraphrase, unsafe markup, and internal inconsistency.
- Generating reviewable workflow proposals inside the private control room.
Where AI is not authoritative
A model output is never cited as evidence for an outside fact. Models do not conduct interviews, witness events, possess lived experience, or hold professional licenses. ClariCurrent does not assign invented degrees, employers, awards, photographs, social accounts, or personal histories to automated editorial roles.
Human accountability
Every public article is assigned to a permanent editorial desk. These desk bylines identify editorial responsibilities, not necessarily an individual journalist. Eligible stories can be researched, drafted, revised, reviewed by separate AI systems, and published automatically. Automated source checking does not establish that a human journalist, doctor, scientist, or financial professional approved an article. Topics the workflow classifies as requiring accountable human judgment remain on hold. A human contributor is credited only when their participation is verified.
Context photographs
Some stories and section previews use licensed photographs to illustrate a subject. These are labeled “Context photograph” and are not evidence of the reported event, product, treatment, or date. Credits identify the photographer and original image page.
Disclosure on articles
When automation materially shapes a story in a way readers would reasonably want to understand, the article will describe its role. Routine spelling assistance or formatting need not receive a separate label, but substantial automated synthesis, translation, data processing, or generated imagery should be disclosed in context.
Originality and scaled-content safeguards
The system may reject a draft that lacks sufficient independent evidence or reader value. ClariCurrent does not publish pages merely because a keyword, feed item, or trend exists. Combining sources without original explanation, judgment, context, or analysis is not an acceptable article.
Errors and feedback
AI-related concerns may be sent to editor@claricurrent.com. Factual concerns should use the corrections process.
Last reviewed: 10 September 2026 · Questions may be sent to editor@claricurrent.com.